You’ve probably heard about the passive 3d television by now, and how it may or may not be more progressive than an active TV. Many television companies are in a stiff competition with each other when it comes to attracting customers to their door step. Many are saying that the 3d television is here to stay, but is that the truth? Are viewers truly caring about the three dimensional affect that comes with a television or is the HD technique effective? 2d pictures have been very effective when it comes to consumerism and the quality is quite fulfilling. The backlight with a 3d picture is quite dimming with a color that is definitely high performance. With 2d there is a matte screen that looks much better in rooms that are glossy instead of well lit. All of the electronic companies have set their standards extremely high, with 3d tests and experiments. There has always been heated talk on whether or not an audience will invest in content that is 3d if their televisions casually present an image that is already tridimensional.
Who do you think has the best passive 3d TV? Panasonic has quite an edge when it comes to their plasma range and their viewing tests. The sequences in their television are very smooth. Samsung has created effective methods of attracting customers because of the detail and sharpness of the picture. During the picture is a sort of overlap from the left and right eye images but it is said to be better than the Panasonic effect. The 3d glasses set Samsung apart from the rest, but do you want to wear glasses while you are watching TV? LG is the company that has also created glasses that are passive and are much more comfortable to wear than Samsung’s. This comes with 7 pairs of 3d glasses and there is no downside with the picture quality. The screen is very deep and solid with a color that is appealing from a ways away. There isn’t any type of overlapping, which is why the OG passive 3d TV could also be the best passive 3d TV. There is also a regular two dimensional picture, a very effective sound quality and a connection to the internet- all working in full effect.
If you are unaware, three dimensional televisions are one of the two types of technology. The two types are passive effects or active effects that both have its pros and cons. An active 3d feature is now one of the more popular elements being that they are also used in game consoles and within computer screens. This added feature is only relevant if there is a transmitter that has been structured into the screen and with a shutter that is active. There are two different types of images that are sent through your shutter glasses to each eye, and it is the active shutter which is the translation for one complete image. This is referred to as a flickering technique; the active 3d is more available to viewers and it has a resolution that is a bit higher. There is full color provided, which is why many are more attracted to this category.
Although this is a great feature, but the glasses for this are quite expensive and it’s been said that they prolong a headache to the viewers. The television may not be able to refresh an image as fast as it should- the faster the image is refreshed, the more pleasing it is to the eyes of the audience. Passive is more of a recent innovation than active, and it doesn’t send out two images. This feature sends out one that is actually overlapping each other, with the help of material on the screen panel. Passive 3d is often much more affordable, along with the glasses that do not require any electrical charge up for watching. There isn’t any screen flickering which is quite convenient and the glasses are more comfortable. If you are using your screen to entertain a group of people than the passive feature may be more useful to you. It depends on what you’re willing to spend and what type of entertainment that you are looking for.
Incoming search terms:
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
EMail Feed
Twitter
